The Bluechecks Are at It Again
| This article is missing information well-nigh the cultural affect and history of the discipline. (February 2021) |
Introduced in June 2009, the Twitter verification system provides the site's readers with a means to distinguish genuine notable account holders, such as celebrities and organizations, from impostors or parodies.[ane] [ii] A bluish check marker displayed confronting an account proper name indicates that Twitter has taken steps to ensure that the account is really owned by the person or organization whom it is claimed to represent.[3] [4] The check mark does not imply endorsement from Twitter, and does not mean that tweets from a verified account are necessarily accurate or truthful in any way.[v] People with verified accounts on Twitter are often colloquially referred to as "bluish checks" on social media and by reporters.[6]
History [edit]
In June 2009, after beingness criticized by Kanye West and sued past Tony La Russa over unauthorized accounts run by impersonators, the company launched their "Verified Accounts" program.[7] [8] Twitter stated that an account with a "blue tick" verification bluecoat indicates "we've been in contact with the person or entity the account is representing and verified that it is approved".[ix] After the beta menstruum, the visitor stated in their FAQ that it "proactively verifies accounts on an ongoing basis to make information technology easier for users to find who they're looking for" and that they "practice non have requests for verification from the general public".[10] Originally, Twitter took on the responsibility of reaching out to celebrities and other notable to confirm their identities in order to institute a verified business relationship.[xi]
In July 2016, Twitter announced a public application process to grant verified status to an account "if it is determined to be of public interest" and that verification "does not imply an endorsement".[12] [13] [14] In 2017 the visitor began accepting requests for verification, simply information technology was discontinued the same twelvemonth. Twitter explained that the volume of requests for verified accounts had exceeded its power to cope; rather, Twitter determines on its own whom to approach about verified accounts, limiting verification to accounts which are "authentic, notable, and active".[xv] [16]
In November 2020, Twitter appear a relaunch of its verification system in 2021. Co-ordinate to the new policy, Twitter verifies vi different types of accounts; for three of them (companies, brands, and influential individuals like activists), the existence of a Wikipedia page will exist one benchmark for showing that the account has "Off Twitter Notability".[17] Twitter states that information technology will re-open public verification applications at some bespeak in "early 2021".[eighteen] [xix]
Controversy [edit]
Twitter'due south practice and procedure for verifying accounts came nether scrutiny in 2017 after the visitor verified the account of white supremacist and far-right political activist, Jason Kessler. Many who criticized Twitter's conclusion to verify Kessler's account saw this as a political act on the visitor's behalf.[xx] In response, Twitter put its verification process on agree. The visitor tweeted, "Verification was meant to authenticate identity & voice just it is interpreted as an endorsement or an indicator of importance. Nosotros recognize that we have created this confusion and need to resolve it. Nosotros have paused all full general verifications while we work and will study back soon."[21]
Every bit of November 2017, Twitter continued to deny verification of Julian Assange's business relationship following his requests.[22]
In November 2019, Dalit activists of India alleged that higher-caste people become Twitter verification easily and trended hashtags #CancelAllBlueTicksInIndia and #CasteistTwitter.[23] [24] [25] Critics have said that the visitor'southward verification process is not transparent and causes digital marginalisation of already marginalised communities.[26] Twitter Republic of india rejected the allegations, calling them "impartial" and working on a "instance-past-case" policy.[27] [28]
Afterward three years without offering the account verification service, on May xx, 2021, Twitter relaunched its service that attests to user legitimacy[29]. This time offering notability criteria for the business relationship categories of government, companies, brands, and organizations, news organizations and journalists, amusement, sports and activists, organizers, and other influential individuals[30]. Among all these categories listed, information technology miss a specific category that fits scientists[31] and religious[32].
Significance and social impact [edit]
A verified account is a highly sought-after qualification among Twitter users. Since Twitter alone can grant blue cheque marks, they can use them as a passive inducement for users to create more content. Alison Hearn also argues that they introduce a new social class of Twitter users.[33] This can cause tension between verified and non-verified users of the site; when Twitter temporarily locked out verified accounts in the aftermath of the 2020 Twitter bitcoin scam, many non-verified users historic.[34] [35] Though Twitter verification is only meant to verify identity, the bitcoin scam was an case of the social influence held by verified accounts. Because tweets directing users to send bitcoin were sent from verified accounts, the scam was probable more successful than if accounts were chosen at random.[ original inquiry? ]
Losing verified condition [edit]
Twitter retains the right to remove a verified status from any account at any time. If any account violates the Twitter Terms of Service, which includes abusive behavior, impersonation, and a number of other violations it is subject area to losing verified condition. Accounts which undergo administrative changes such as changes in account bio details or changes to the user handle (or @username) are as well at risk of having the bluish cheque removed.[36]
In some situations, Twitter has removed the blue cheque mark from an account due to hate spoken language, every bit was the case with Louis Farrakhan's account in 2018.[37]
References [edit]
- ^ Staff, PCMag (12 June 2009). "Phew! Twitter Verifies Celebrity Tweets equally Authentic". PCMag. AppScout. Archived from the original on 6 February 2021. Retrieved 6 February 2021.
- ^ Cashmore, Pete (11 June 2009). "Twitter Launches Verified Accounts". Mashable. Archived from the original on xv June 2009. Retrieved 6 Feb 2021.
It'll too solve the entrenched trouble of celebrity impersonations, which are confusing for users and unwelcome past those existence impersonated.
- ^ Manfredi, Lucas (2020-07-fifteen). "Twitter's Blue Checkmark explained". Fox Business. Archived from the original on 2021-02-09. Retrieved 2021-02-03 .
- ^ Kanalley, Craig (2013-03-12). "Why Twitter Verifies Users". Huffington Postal service. Archived from the original on 2018-09-27. Retrieved 2021-02-03 .
- ^ Welch, Chris (2018-07-17). "Twitter says it doesn't 'have the bandwidth' to ready verification right now". The Verge. Archived from the original on 2021-01-28. Retrieved 2021-02-03 .
- ^ Bishop, Rollin (March 30, 2017). "'Verified' is now a derogatory term on Twitter". The Outline. Archived from the original on 2020-eleven-29. Retrieved 2021-02-03 .
- ^ Stone, Biz (June 6, 2009). "Not Playing Ball". Twitter.
- ^ Kanalley, Craig (March 12, 2013). "Why Twitter Verifies Users: The History Behind the Blue Checkmark". Huffington Post . Retrieved June 9, 2014.
- ^ Cashmore, Pete (June xi, 2009). "Twitter Launches Verified Accounts". Retrieved June 9, 2014.
- ^ "FAQs about verified accounts". Archived from the original on July 19, 2016.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link) - ^ Warfield, Katie. Mediated Interfaces: The Body on Social Media. Bloomsbury. p. 55.
- ^ "About verified accounts". Archived from the original on July xx, 2016.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link) - ^ "Announcing an Application Process for Verified Accounts". Twitter. July 19, 2016.
- ^ Burgess, Matt (July 20, 2016). "Twitter opens verification to all". Wired . Retrieved September xvi, 2016.
- ^ Delo, Cotton (2012-01-10). "1 Mode to Go a Twitter 'Verified Account': Buy Ads". Ad Age. Archived from the original on 2021-02-08. Retrieved 2021-02-03 .
- ^ "About verified accounts". help.twitter.com. Archived from the original on 2017-12-05. Retrieved 2021-02-03 .
- ^ Harrison, Stephen (December four, 2020). "Twitter Wants to Apply Wikipedia to Help Determine Who Gets a Blue Checkmark". Slate Magazine . Retrieved December iv, 2020.
- ^ Statt, Nick (Dec 17, 2020). "Twitter is launching its new verification policy on January 20th". The Verge . Retrieved February xix, 2021.
- ^ Allyn, Bobby (November 24, 2020). "Twitter To Accept Blue Check Mark Requests in 2021 Following 3-Year Hiatus". NPR.
- ^ Bowles, Nellie (2017-eleven-09). "Twitter, Facing Another Uproar, Pauses Its Verification Process". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 2021-04-16. Retrieved 2021-04-16 .
- ^ Twitter Support [@twittersupport] (November ix, 2017). "Verification was meant to authenticate identity & voice but information technology is interpreted as an endorsement or an indicator of importance. Nosotros recognize that we have created this confusion and need to resolve it. Nosotros accept paused all full general verifications while nosotros piece of work and will study dorsum soon" (Tweet). Retrieved 2021-04-xvi – via Twitter.
- ^ Tiku, Nitasha (November x, 2017). "Twitter's Hallmark Policy Is a Verified Mess". Wired.
- ^ "#CancelAllBlueTicksInIndia trends on Twitter, netizens slam degree-based discrimination". The Economical Times. November vi, 2019. Retrieved February half-dozen, 2020.
- ^ "#cancelallBlueTicksinIndia Trends As Twitter Faces Caste Storm". The Quint. November 6, 2019. Retrieved Feb 6, 2020.
- ^ "Why Dalit activists are furious with 'casteist' Twitter". Free Press Journal . Retrieved Feb 6, 2020.
- ^ "'The Blue Janeu': As Critics Cry 'Casteism', Twitter Ducks for Cover". The Wire . Retrieved February 6, 2020.
- ^ "Twitter reacts to accusations of caste bias, says it'due south 'impartial'". Free Press Periodical . Retrieved Feb 6, 2020.
- ^ "Twitter Cites 'Case-By-Case' Verification Policy as Casteism Allegations Ravage Platform". News18. November 7, 2019. Retrieved February half-dozen, 2020.
- ^ "Relaunching verification and what'due south side by side". blog.twitter.com . Retrieved 2022-05-13 .
- ^ "Twitter Verification requirements - how to get the bluish check". help.twitter.com . Retrieved 2022-05-13 .
- ^ Pereira, Cássio Cardoso (2022-05-03). "Twitter: a blueish badge for scientists?". Nature. 605 (7908): 30–30. doi:10.1038/d41586-022-01188-y.
- ^ "Twitter Verification requirements - how to get the blue check". assist.twitter.com . Retrieved 2022-05-13 .
- ^ Hearn, Alison (2017-04-03). "Verified: Self-presentation, identity management, and selfhood in the age of big information". Popular Communication. 15 (2): 62–77. doi:10.1080/15405702.2016.1269909. ISSN 1540-5702.
- ^ Watercutter, Angela (July 16, 2020). "Twitter Is at Its Best When Verified Accounts Tin't Tweet". Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on January 20, 2021. Retrieved February 3, 2021.
- ^ Joseph, Andrew (fifteen July 2020). "Hack: Twitter locks Blue Checks; unverified accounts react with jokes". USA Today. Archived from the original on 16 July 2020. Retrieved 6 Feb 2021.
- ^ "Twitter verification requirements - how to get the blue bank check". help.twitter.com. Archived from the original on 2017-12-05. Retrieved 2021-04-16 .
- ^ Maza, Cristina (June 11, 2018). "Nation of Islam Leader Louis Farrakhan Loses Twitter Verification for Calling Jews 'Satanic'". Newsweek. Archived from the original on December 7, 2020. Retrieved February 28, 2021.
External links [edit]
- Twitter Support — About Verified Accounts
- Twitter Support — Verification FAQ
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitter_verification
0 Response to "The Bluechecks Are at It Again"
Post a Comment